ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Impact of preprocessing methods on the Raman spectra of brain tissue.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Raman Spectroscopy through Open Science and FAIR Principles.ACS nano · 2025Review
- Influence of preprocessing of stimulated Raman scattering images on the performance of deep neural networks for detecting cancer tissue.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Raman and autofluorescence spectroscopy for in situ identification of neoplastic tissue during surgical treatment of brain tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Artifacts and Anomalies in Raman Spectroscopy: A Review on Origins and Correction Procedures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Rapid and label-free influenza A virus subtyping using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with incident-wavelength analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Introduction to the Optics and the Brain 2023 feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Extended Analysis of Raman Spectra Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Colorectal Abnormality Classification.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Optical Differentiation of Brain Tumors Based on Raman Spectroscopy and Cluster Analysis Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Combined Use of Frameless Neuronavigation and In Situ Optical Guidance in Brain Tumor Needle Biopsies.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Impact of preprocessing methods on the Raman spectra of brain tissue.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delineating cancer tissue while leaving functional tissue intact is crucial in brain tumor resection. Despite several available aids, surgeons are limited by preoperative or subjective tools. Raman spectroscopy is a label-free optical technique with promising indications for tumor tissue identification. To allow direct comparisons between measurements preprocessing of the Raman signal is required. There are many recognized methods for preprocessing Raman spectra; however, there is no universal standard. In this paper, six different preprocessing methods were tested on Raman spectra (n > 900) from fresh brain tissue samples (n = 34). The sample cohort included both primary brain tumors, such as adult-type diffuse gliomas and meningiomas, as well as metastases of breast cancer. Each tissue sample was classified according to the CNS WHO 2021 guidelines. The six methods include both direct and iterative polynomial fitting, mathematical morphology, signal derivative, commercial software, and a neural network. Data exploration was performed using principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, and k-means clustering. For each of the six methods, the parameter combination that explained the most variance in the data, i.e., resulting in the highest Gap-statistic, was chosen and compared to the other five methods. Depending on the preprocessing method, the resulting clusters varied in number, size, and associated spectral features. The detected features were associated with hemoglobin, neuroglobin, carotenoid, water, and protoporphyrin, as well as proteins and lipids. However, the spectral features seen in the Raman spectra could not be unambiguously assigned to tissue labels, regardless of preprocessing method. We have illustrated that depending on the chosen preprocessing method, the spectral appearance of Raman features from brain tumor tissue can change. Therefore, we argue both for caution in comparing spectral features from different Raman studies, as well as the importance of transparency of methodology and implementation of the preprocessing. As discussed in this study, Raman spectroscopy for
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.