Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589553›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Impact of preprocessing methods on the Raman spectra of brain tissue.

Joel Wahl, Elisabeth Klint, Martin Hallbeck, Jan Hillman, Karin Wårdell, Kerstin Ramser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel WahlDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.
Elisabeth KlintDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-9841
Martin HallbeckDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-0314
Jan HillmanDepartment of Neurosurgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Karin WårdellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Kerstin RamserDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3268-1691
Linköping University · SELuleå University of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delineating cancer tissue while leaving functional tissue intact is crucial in brain tumor resection. Despite several available aids, surgeons are limited by preoperative or subjective tools. Raman spectroscopy is a label-free optical technique with promising indications for tumor tissue identification. To allow direct comparisons between measurements preprocessing of the Raman signal is required. There are many recognized methods for preprocessing Raman spectra; however, there is no universal standard. In this paper, six different preprocessing methods were tested on Raman spectra (n > 900) from fresh brain tissue samples (n = 34). The sample cohort included both primary brain tumors, such as adult-type diffuse gliomas and meningiomas, as well as metastases of breast cancer. Each tissue sample was classified according to the CNS WHO 2021 guidelines. The six methods include both direct and iterative polynomial fitting, mathematical morphology, signal derivative, commercial software, and a neural network. Data exploration was performed using principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, and k-means clustering. For each of the six methods, the parameter combination that explained the most variance in the data, i.e., resulting in the highest Gap-statistic, was chosen and compared to the other five methods. Depending on the preprocessing method, the resulting clusters varied in number, size, and associated spectral features. The detected features were associated with hemoglobin, neuroglobin, carotenoid, water, and protoporphyrin, as well as proteins and lipids. However, the spectral features seen in the Raman spectra could not be unambiguously assigned to tissue labels, regardless of preprocessing method. We have illustrated that depending on the chosen preprocessing method, the spectral appearance of Raman features from brain tumor tissue can change. Therefore, we argue both for caution in comparing spectral features from different Raman studies, as well as the importance of transparency of methodology and implementation of the preprocessing. As discussed in this study, Raman spectroscopy for

Identifiers

PMID36589553
PMCPMC9774863
OpenAlexW4309182654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.