Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589480›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Effectiveness of a Third Dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine During the Omicron BA.1- and BA.2-Predominant Periods in Japan: The VENUS Study.

Wataru Mimura, Chieko Ishiguro, Megumi Maeda, Fumiko Murata, Haruhisa Fukuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wataru MimuraSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-343X
Chieko IshiguroSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-9430
Megumi MaedaDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fumiko MurataDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Haruhisa FukudaDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine effectiveness against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron BA.2 sublineage in Japan is unknown. We assessed the effectiveness of a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine compared with that of 2 doses. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study using a municipality database located in the Chubu region of Japan during the Omicron BA.1- and BA.2-predominant periods (January 1-March 31, 2022 and April 1-27, 2022, respectively). We included residents aged ≥16 years who received a second vaccine dose at ≥14 days before the start of each period, regardless of the third dose. We compared the data at 14 days after the second and third dose and at 2-week intervals from 14 days to 10 weeks after the third dose using a Cox regression model. Vaccine effectiveness was defined as (1 - hazard ratio) × 100 (%). Results: In total, 295 705 and 288 184 individuals were included in the BA.1- and BA.2-predominant periods, respectively. The effectiveness of a third dose against infection was 62.4% and 48.1% in the BA.1- and BA.2-predominant periods, respectively. Vaccine effectiveness at 2-3 weeks and ≥10 weeks after the third dose decreased from 63.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.4-69.5%) to 52.9% (95% CI, 41.1-62.3%) and from 54.5% (95% CI, 3.0-78.7%) to 40.1% (95% CI, 15.1-57.7%) in the BA.1- and BA.2-predominant periods, respectively. Conclusions: A third dose was moderately effective against BA.1 and BA.2 sublineages, but its effectiveness decreased by approximately 10% age points from 2-3 weeks to ≥10 weeks after the third vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19JapanmRNA vaccineSARS-COV-2vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36589480
PMCPMC9792082
OpenAlexW4309855627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.