Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589396›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal

Effect of diet supplemented with graded levels of garlic (

Majdi A Kairalla, Mohamed I Alshelmani, Abdalhakim A Aburas

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dandelion (Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Buckwheat: An Underutilized Himalayan Crop with Multifaceted Nutraceutical Benefits.Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of anAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Majdi A KairallaDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sebha, Sebha, Libya.
Mohamed I AlshelmaniDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.
Abdalhakim A AburasDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alzintan, Libya.
Sebha University · LYUniversity of Benghazi · LY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, attention has been paid to using plants with medicinal efficacy as alternates to antibiotics and growth promoters. Garlic is a traditional plant used as a spice and herb in broilers. Aim: To investigate the effect of garlic powder on broiler performance, carcass characteristics, blood hematology, and biochemistry. Method: A total of 240 1-day-old broiler chicks (Cobb500) were purchased from a local hatchery and randomly distributed into four dietary treatments. Each treatment comprised 5 replicates with 12 chicks each. Garlic powder ( Results: The findings showed that birds fed a diet supplemented by 0.3% garlic powder was significantly ( Conclusion: It can be concluded that the supplementation of 0.3% garlic powder as a growth promoter leads to reducing the cost of production through improving growth performance and enhancing birds' health.

Indexed as

GarlicHematologyAnimalsBody WeightChickensDietDietary SupplementsPowdersPowdersBroilerCarcass characteristicsGarlicGrowthHematology

Identifiers

PMID36589396
PMCPMC9789753
OpenAlexW4313166218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.