ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022
Assessment of facial video-based detection of atrial fibrillation across human complexion.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Observational
- Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation: emerging applications, research directions and ethical considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Analysis of Facial Photographs for Predicting Bicuspid Aortic Valve.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Challenges and prospects of visual contactless physiological monitoring in clinical study.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Setting of Reperfusion Therapy: Insights and Strategies for Optimized Care.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early self-detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) can help delay and/or prevent significant associated complications, including embolic stroke and heart failure. We developed a facial video technology, videoplethysmography (VPG), to detect AF based on the analysis of facial pulsatile signals. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a video-based technology to detect AF on a smartphone and to test the performance of the technology in AF patients across the whole spectrum of skin complexion and under various recording conditions. Methods: The performance of video-based monitoring depends on a set of factors such as the angle and the distance between the camera and the patient's face, the strength of illumination, and the patient's skin tone. We conducted a clinical study involving 60 subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of AF. A continuous electrocardiogram was used as the gold standard for cardiac rhythm annotation. The VPG technology was fine-tuned on a smartphone for the first 15 subjects. Validation recordings were then done using 7053 measurements collected from the remaining 45 subjects. Results: The VPG technology detected the presence of AF using the video camera from a common smartphone with sensitivity and specificity ≥90%. The ambient level of illumination needs to be ≥100 lux for the technology to deliver consistent performance across all skin tones. Conclusion: We demonstrated that facial video-based detection of AF provides accurate outpatient cardiac monitoring including high pulse rate accuracy and medical-grade performance for AF detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.