ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022
Exploring telerobotic cardiac catheter ablation in a rural community hospital: A pilot study.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mini- and Micro-Invasive Approaches in Cardiac Surgery: Current Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Remote and Telerobotic Ultrasound Imaging.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telerobotic surgery could improve access to specialty procedures such as cardiac catheter ablation in rural and underserved regions in the United States and worldwide. Advancements in telecommunications, internet infrastructure, and surgical robotics are lowering the technical hurdles for this future healthcare delivery paradigm. Nonetheless, important questions remain regarding the safe implementation of telerobotic surgery in rural community hospital settings. Objective: The purpose of this study was to pilot test a system and methods to explore telerobotic cardiac catheter ablation in a rural community hospital setting. Methods: We assembled a portable preclinical telerobotic catheter ablation system from commercial-grade components using third-party vendors. We then carried out 4 telerobotic surgery simulations with an urban surgeon and a rural community hospital operating room (OR) team spanning a distance of more than 2000 miles. Two challenge scenarios were incorporated into the simulations, including loss of network connection and cardiac perforation with subsequent life-threatening tamponade physiology. An ethnographic analysis was then performed. Results: Interviews and observations suggested that rural OR teams readily adapt to the telesurgery context. However, participant perceptions of team trust, communication, and emergency management were significantly altered by the remote location of the surgeon. In addition, most participants believed the OR team would have been better equipped for the challenges had they received formal training or had prior experience with the procedure being simulated. Conclusion: We demonstrate the utility and feasibility of a system and methods for studying specialty telerobotic surgery in a rural hospital OR setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.