ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022
Inside the "black box": Embedding clinical knowledge in data-driven machine learning for heart disease diagnosis.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardio-Oncology: A Comprehensive Review.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence bias in the prediction and detection of cardiovascular disease.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Identifies Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology.Artificial intelligence review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) caused by the narrowing of coronary arteries is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Clinical diagnosis involves complex, costly, and potentially invasive procedures. Objective: To address this problem, we introduce a novel clinical knowledge-enhanced machine learning (ML) pipeline to assist in timely and cost-effective IHD prediction. Methods: Unlike conventional data-driven "black box" ML approaches, we propose an effective mechanism to engage clinical expertise and gain insight into the "black box" at each stage of model development, including data analysis, preprocessing, selecting the most clinically discriminative features, and model evaluation. One-hot feature encoding is introduced to expose hidden bias and highlight the important elements and features. Results: Experimental results on the benchmark Cleveland IHD dataset showed that the proposed clinical knowledge-enhanced ML pipeline overperformed state-of-the-art data-driven ML models, using even fewer features. Our model based on one-hot feature encoding and support vector machine achieved the best accuracy of 94.4% and sensitivity 95% by using only 7 discriminative attributes. Conclusion: We share insights and discuss the effectiveness of incorporating clinical input in machine learning to improve model performance, as well as addressing some practical issues such as data bias and interpretability. We hope this preliminary study on engaging clinical expertise to explore the "black box" would improve the trustworthiness of AI and its potential wider uptake in the medical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.