Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589302›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2022

Interlibrary loan and document delivery in North American health sciences libraries during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jennifer K Lloyd, Kristine M Alpi, Margaret A Hoogland, Priscilla L Stephenson, Elizabeth Meyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer K Lloydjlloyd@lsuhsc.edu, LSU Health Sciences Center Libraries, New Orleans, LA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-1437
Kristine M Alpikrisalpi@gmail.com, Associate Dean of Libraries & Information Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-3523
Margaret A Hooglandmargaret.hoogland@utoledo.edu, University Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-3605
Priscilla L Stephensonpstephenson9116@yahoo.com, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital & Clinics, Tampa, FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-1973
Elizabeth Meyeremeyer2018@gmail.com, Clinicient, Portland, OR.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USOregon Clinic · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study purpose was to understand how early months of the COVID-19 pandemic altered interlibrary loan (ILL) and document delivery (DD) in North American health science libraries (HSLs), specifically the decision-making and workflow adjustments associated with accessing their own collections and obtaining content not available via ILL. Methods: Researchers distributed an online 26-question survey through 24 health science library email lists from January 6-February 7, 2021. Respondents reported their library's ILL and DD activities from March-August 2020, including ILL/DD usage and policies, collection access, decision-making, and workflow adjustments. In addition to calculating frequencies, cross-tabulation and statistical tests were performed to test a priori potential associations. Two researchers independently and thematically analyzed responses to the 2 open-ended questions and reached consensus on themes. Results: Hospital libraries represented 52% (n=226/431) of respondents, along with 42% academic (n=179) and 6% (n=26) multi-type or other special. Only 1% (n=5) closed completely with no remote services, but many, 45% (n=194), ceased ILL of print materials. More than half (n=246/423; 58%) agreed that ILL requests likely to be filled from print remained unfilled more than is typical. Open-ended questions yielded 5 themes on ILL/DD staffing, setup, and systems; 6 on impacts for libraries and library users. Conclusion: Lack of communication regarding collection availability and staffing resulted in delayed or unfilled requests. Hospital and academic libraries made similar decisions about continuing services but reported different experiences in areas such as purchasing digital content. Hybrid ILL/DD workflows may continue for managing these services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Libraries, MedicalHumansInterlibrary LoansNorth AmericaPandemicsAccess servicesCOVID-19document deliveryhealth sciences librarieshospital librariesinterlibrary loanprint collections

Identifiers

PMID36589302
PMCPMC9782377
OpenAlexW4311938020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.