Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589297›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2022

Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPolla, Caitlin J Bakker, Nina Exner, Tisha Montnech, Alisa Surkis, Hao Ye

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Influence of Physiologic Burdens Related to Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Cardiovascular Outcomes.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPollafred.lapolla@nyulangone.org, Research and Data Librarian, Lead of Data Education, NYU Health Sciences Library, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-9753
Caitlin J Bakkercjbakker@umn.edu, Director, Open Research & Publishing, University of Minnesota Libraries, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-8382
Nina Exnernexner@vcu.edu, Research Data Librarian, VCU Libraries, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-8364
Tisha Montnechtdmentne@ncsu.edu, Research Librarian for Life Sciences and Research Metrics, North Carolina State University Libraries, Raleigh, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-188X
Alisa Surkisalisa.surkis@nyulangone.org, Deputy Director, Medical Library, NYU Health Sciences Library, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-2693
Hao Yehaoye@ufl.edu, Reproducibility Librarian, George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-8630-1458
University of Minnesota · USNew York Public Library · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Concerns over scientific reproducibility have grown in recent years, leading the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to require researchers to address these issues in research grant applications. Starting in 2020, training grants were required to provide a plan for educating trainees in rigor and reproducibility. Academic medical centers have responded with different solutions to fill this educational need. As experienced instructors with expertise in topics relating to reproducibility, librarians can play a prominent role in providing trainings, classes, and events to educate investigators and trainees, and bolstering reproducibility in their communities. Case Presentations: This special report summarizes efforts at five institutions to provide education in reproducibility to biomedical and life sciences researchers. Our goal is to expand awareness of the range of approaches in providing reproducibility services in libraries. Conclusions: Reproducibility education by medical librarians can take many forms. These specific programs in reproducibility education build upon libraries' existing collaborations, with funder mandates providing a major impetus. Collaborator needs shaped the exact type of educational or other reproducibility support and combined with each library's strengths to yield a diversity of offerings based on capacity and interest. As demand for and complexity of reproducibility education increases due to new institutional and funder mandates, reproducibility education will merit special attention.

Indexed as

LibrariansLibraries, MedicalAcademic Medical CentersHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Reproducibility of ResultsResearch PersonnelUnited Stateseducationlibrary instructionNIH requirementsreplicabilityreproducibilityrigor and reproducibility

Identifiers

PMID36589297
PMCPMC9782585
OpenAlexW4311938093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.