Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589219›Full record

ArticleGlobal health & medicine2022

Long-term sequelae of different COVID-19 variants: The original strain versus the Omicron variant.

Xuejiao Liao, Yuan Guan, Qibin Liao, Zhenghua Ma, Liping Zhang, Jingke Dong, Xiaojuan Lai, Guoqin Zheng, Sumei Yang, Cheng Wang and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuejiao LiaoInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuan GuanInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Qibin LiaoInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhenghua MaInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Liping ZhangInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jingke DongInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojuan LaiInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Guoqin ZhengInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Sumei YangInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Cheng WangInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhonghui LiaoInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shuo SongInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hongyang YiInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hongzhou LuInstitute for Hepatology, Bio-therapeutic Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital; The Second Hospital Affiliated with the School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research · USBengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Omicron appears to cause less severe acute illness than the original strain, the potential for large numbers of patients to experience long COVID is a major concern. Little is known about the recovery phase in cases of Omicron, highlighting the importance of dynamically monitor long COVID in those patients. Subjects of the current study were patients available for a three-month follow-up who were admitted from January 13 to May 22, 2020 (period of the original strain) and from January 1 to May 30, 2022 (period of Omicron). Twenty-eight-point-four percent of patients infected with the original strain had long-term symptoms of COVID-19 and 5.63% of those infected with the Omicron strain had such symptoms. The most common symptom was a cough (18.5%), followed by tightness in the chest (6.5%), in patients infected with the original strain. Fatigue (2.4%) and dyspnea (1.7%) were the most commonly reported symptoms in patients infected with the Omicron strain. The respiratory system is the primary target of SARSCoV-2. Supportive treatment is the basis for the treatment of respiratory symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Quality sleep and good nutrition may alleviate fatigue and mental issues. Further knowledge about a long-term syndrome due to Omicron needs to be discussed and assembled so that healthcare and workforce planners can rapidly obtain information to appropriately allocate resources.

Indexed as

long COVIDlong-term sequelaeOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36589219
PMCPMC9773225
OpenAlexW4313391689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.