Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589120›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Increasing cassava root yield: Additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.

Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade, Massaine Bandeira E Sousa, Marnin Wolfe, Jean-Luc Jannink, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Eder Jorge de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciano Rogério Braatz de AndradeDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Massaine Bandeira E SousaEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.
Marnin WolfeDepartment of Crop, Soil and Environment Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Jean-Luc JanninkSection on Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Marcos Deon Vilela de ResendeDepartment of Forestry Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira AzevedoDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eder Jorge de OliveiraEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cπ, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties.

Indexed as

breedingbreeding valuesdominancegenomic selectiongenotypic valuesnon-additive effects

Identifiers

PMID36589120
PMCPMC9800927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.