Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588782›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2022

Robotic Assistance for Intraocular Microsurgery: Challenges and Perspectives.

Iulian I Iordachita, Marc D de Smet, Gerrit Naus, Mamoru Mitsuishi, Cameron N Riviere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Robotising vitreoretinal surgeries.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of (Shared) Autonomy in Robot-Assisted Vitreoretinal Surgery Using a Surgical Model.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  7. Stapler for corneal transplantation: a hypothesis.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Autonomous Needle Navigation in Subretinal Injections via iOCT.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards Autonomous Retinal Microsurgery Using RGB-D Images.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring An External Approach to Subretinal Drug Delivery via Robot Assistance and B-Mode OCT.IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iulian I IordachitaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marc D de SmetMicroinvasive Ocular Surgery Center (MIOS), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gerrit NausPreceyes BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Mamoru MitsuishiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Cameron N RiviereRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

An Active Handheld MicromanipulatorR01EB000526 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RIVIERE, CAMERON N · 2003 to 2017
$2.6M
Enabling Technology for Safe Robot-assisted Surgical MicromanipulationR01EB023943 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEHLBACH, PETER LOUIS, IORDACHITA, IULIAN IOAN · 2017 to 2024
$2.3M
Enabling technology for image-guided robot-assisted sub-retinal injectionsR01EB025883 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IORDACHITA, IULIAN IOAN · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
Multi-Frequency Tracker for Control of Handheld Surgical Robotic SystemsR01EB024564 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RIVIERE, CAMERON N · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000526NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023943NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024564NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular surgery, one of the most challenging discipline of microsurgery, requires sensory and motor skills at the limits of human physiological capabilities combined with tremendously difficult requirements for accuracy and steadiness. Nowadays, robotics combined with advanced imaging has opened conspicuous and significant directions in advancing the field of intraocular microsurgery. Having patient treatment with greater safety and efficiency as the final goal, similar to other medical applications, robotics has a real potential to fundamentally change microsurgery by combining human strengths with computer and sensor-based technology in an information-driven environment. Still in its early stages, robotic assistance for intraocular microsurgery has been accepted with precaution in the operating room and successfully tested in a limited number of clinical trials. However, owing to its demonstrated capabilities including hand tremor reduction, haptic feedback, steadiness, enhanced dexterity, micrometer-scale accuracy, and others, microsurgery robotics has evolved as a very promising trend in advancing retinal surgery. This paper will analyze the advances in retinal robotic microsurgery, its current drawbacks and limitations, as well as the possible new directions to expand retinal microsurgery to techniques currently beyond human boundaries or infeasible without robotics.

Indexed as

controlMedical roboticsrobotic surgerysensingvitreoretinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID36588782
PMCPMC9799958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.