Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588765›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022

Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection.

Meghavi Rana, Megha Bhushan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Human Crystallin Variation and Cataract.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meghavi RanaSchool of Computing, DIT University, Dehradun, India.
Megha BhushanSchool of Computing, DIT University, Dehradun, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4309-875X
Dehradun Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided detection using Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) shows tremendous growth in the medical field. Medical images are considered as the actual origin of appropriate information required for diagnosis of disease. Detection of disease at the initial stage, using various modalities, is one of the most important factors to decrease mortality rate occurring due to cancer and tumors. Modalities help radiologists and doctors to study the internal structure of the detected disease for retrieving the required features. ML has limitations with the present modalities due to large amounts of data, whereas DL works efficiently with any amount of data. Hence, DL is considered as the enhanced technique of ML where ML uses the learning techniques and DL acquires details on how machines should react around people. DL uses a multilayered neural network to get more information about the used datasets. This study aims to present a systematic literature review related to applications of ML and DL for the detection along with classification of multiple diseases. A detailed analysis of 40 primary studies acquired from the well-known journals and conferences between Jan 2014-2022 was done. It provides an overview of different approaches based on ML and DL for the detection along with the classification of multiple diseases, modalities for medical imaging, tools and techniques used for the evaluation, description of datasets. Further, experiments are performed using MRI dataset to provide a comparative analysis of ML classifiers and DL models. This study will assist the healthcare community by enabling medical practitioners and researchers to choose an appropriate diagnosis technique for a given disease with reduced time and high accuracy.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkDeep learningHealthcareMachine learningMedical image processingTransfer learningTumor classification

Identifiers

PMID36588765
PMCPMC9788870
OpenAlexW4312112335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.