Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588660›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health2022

Healthcare workers' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters for themselves, their patients, and their communities: a mixed methods study.

Shana A B Burrowes, Sharon M Casey, Sidney Dobbins, Taylor Hall, Mengyu Ma, Ruqiyya Bano, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Elissa M Schechter-Perkins, Christopher Garofalo, Rebecca B Perkins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shana A B Burrowes *Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA.
Sharon M Casey *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Sidney DobbinsBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Taylor HallGraduate of Medical Sciences, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA.
Mengyu MaBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Ruqiyya BanoBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA.
Elissa M Schechter-PerkinsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA USA.
Christopher GarofaloDepartment of Family Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sturdy Memorial Hospital, Attleboro, MA USA.
Rebecca B PerkinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Natalie Pierre-JosephDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To examine experiences and attitudes of a diverse sample of clinical and non-clinical healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 vaccines and boosters for themselves, their patients, and their communities. Subject and methods: We conducted a sequential exploratory mixed methods study; 52 healthcare workers participated in qualitative interviews between April 22 and September 7, 2021, and 209 healthcare workers completed surveys between February 17 and March 23, 2022. Interviews and survey questions asked about personal attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and boosters and experiences discussing vaccination with patients. Results: Participants were predominantly White (56% and 73%, respectively) and female (79% and 81%, respectively). Factors motivating healthcare workers to take the vaccine were the belief that vaccination would protect themselves, their families, patients, and communities. Healthcare workers were accepting of and had high receipt of the booster, though some had diminished belief in its effectiveness after becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 after initial vaccination. Race related mistrust, misinformation related to vaccine safety, and concerns about vaccine effects during pregnancy were the most common barriers that providers encountered among their patients and communities. Conclusions: Healthcare workers' primary motivation to receive COVID-19 vaccines was the desire to protect themselves and others. Healthcare workers' perception was that concerns about safety and misinformation were more important barriers for their patients than themselves. Race-related medical mistrust amplified concerns about vaccine safety and hindered communication efforts.

Indexed as

COVID-19 boostersCOVID-19 vaccinesHealthcare workersMisinformationVaccination hesitancyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36588660
PMCPMC9790765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.