ReviewMissouri medicine
Use of Laboratory Tests and Their Prognostic Value in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Review in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analyzing Clinical Parameters and Bacterial Profiles to Uncover the COPD Exacerbations: A Focus on Intensive Care Unit Challenges.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not merely a lung disease as the name indicates. Patients with COPD experience associated complications with systemic inflammation, heart strain, muscle wasting, poor functional performance, and psychological issues. An assessment of these patients based only on lung function tests or functional capacity would be inadequate. Many studies have reported the significance and prognostic value of several laboratory tests. Troponin, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin, and carbon dioxide are older tests but compared with the newly developed tests, they are relatively inexpensive to measure and widely available. This article will review laboratory tests used for COPD and discuss their prognostic value. The laboratory tests that can identify high-risk patients will be discussed. We will explore the role of these tests in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36588649PMC9762209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.