ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Myocardial strain analysis of echocardiography based on deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automatic 4D mitral valve segmentation from transesophageal echocardiography: a semi-supervised learning approach.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Driven Innovations in Echocardiography: Taxonomy, Clinical Impact, Challenges, and Opportunities.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- New Solution for Segmental Assessment of Left Ventricular Wall Thickness, Using Anatomically Accurate and Highly Reproducible Automated Cardiac MRI Software.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management planning of bicuspid aortic valvular disease: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Deep-learning-based estimation of left ventricle myocardial strain from echocardiograms with occlusion artifacts.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Echocardiographic video-driven multi-task learning model for coronary artery disease diagnosis and severity grading.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Deep learning improves test-retest reproducibility of regional strain in echocardiography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Advancements and applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: a comprehensive review.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Review
- Deep Learning for Echocardiography: Introduction for Clinicians and Future Vision: State-of-the-Art Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strain analysis provides more thorough spatiotemporal signatures for myocardial contraction, which is helpful for early detection of cardiac insufficiency. The use of deep learning (DL) to automatically measure myocardial strain from echocardiogram videos has garnered recent attention. However, the development of key techniques including segmentation and motion estimation remains a challenge. In this work, we developed a novel DL-based framework for myocardial segmentation and motion estimation to generate strain measures from echocardiogram videos. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was developed for myocardial segmentation and optical flow network for motion estimation. The segmentation network was used to define the region of interest (ROI), and the optical flow network was used to estimate the pixel motion in the ROI. We performed a model architecture search to identify the optimal base architecture for motion estimation. The final workflow design and associated hyperparameters are the result of a careful implementation. In addition, we compared the DL model with a traditional speck tracking algorithm on an independent, external clinical data. Each video was double-blind measured by an ultrasound expert and a DL expert using speck tracking echocardiography (STE) and DL method, respectively. Results: The DL method successfully performed automatic segmentation, motion estimation, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) measurements in all examinations. The 3D segmentation has better spatio-temporal smoothness, average dice correlation reaches 0.82, and the effect of target frame is better than that of previous 2D networks. The best motion estimation network achieved an average end-point error of 0.05 ± 0.03 mm per frame, better than previously reported state-of-the-art. The DL method showed no significant difference relative to the traditional method in GLS measurement, Spearman correlation of 0.90 ( Conclusion: In conclusion, our method exhibits better segmentation and motion estimation performance and demonstrates the feasibility of DL method for automatic strain analysis. The DL approach helps reduce time consumption and human effort, which holds great promise for translational research and precision medicine efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.