Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588525›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2023

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors According to the 2019 World Health Organization Grading System: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Yuri Kim, Bokyung Ahn, Kee Don Choi, Beom-Su Kim, Jeong-Hwan Yook, Gin Hyug Lee, Seung-Mo Hong, Jeong Hoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Type 2 and type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumors have high risk of lymph node metastasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuri KimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-065X
Bokyung AhnDepartments of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0229-2276
Kee Don ChoiDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-4109
Beom-Su KimDepartments of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-2086
Jeong-Hwan YookDepartments of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7987-5808
Gin Hyug LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-3928
Seung-Mo HongDepartments of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-6007
Jeong Hoon LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-7585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Although gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon neoplasms, their prevalence is increasing. The clinical importance of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric NETs, compared with NETs in other organs, has been underestimated. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of gastric NETs based on the 2019 WHO classification and to assess the survival outcomes of patients from a single-center with a long-term follow-up. Methods: The medical records of 427 patients with gastric NETs who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection between January 2000 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All specimens were reclassified according to the 2019 WHO classification. The clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and oncologic outcomes of 139 gastric NETs were analyzed. Results: The patients' median age was 53.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46.0 to 63.0 years). The median follow-up period was 36.0 months (IQR, 15.0 to 63.0 months). Of the patients, 92, 44, and 3 had grades 1, 2, and 3 NETs, respectively. The mean tumor size significantly increased as the tumor grade increased (p=0.025). Patients with grades 2 and 3 gastric NETs more frequently had lymphovascular invasion (29.8% vs 10.9%, p=0.005) and deeper tissue invasion (8.5% vs 0%, p=0.012) than those with grade 1 tumors. The overall disease-specific survival rate was 100%. Two patients with grades 2-3 gastric NETs experienced extragastric recurrence. Conclusions: Although gastric NETs have an excellent prognosis, grade 2 or grade 3 gastric NETs are associated with a larger size, deeper invasion, and extragastric recurrence, which require active treatment.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesWorld Health OrganizationClassificationNeuroendocrine tumorStomachSurvivalWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID36588525
PMCPMC10651375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.