Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588438›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2022

Triple-Network Dysconnectivity in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis and Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Ahra Kim, Minji Ha, Taekwan Kim, Sunghyun Park, Silvia Kyungjin Lho, Sun-Young Moon, Minah Kim, Jun Soo Kwon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring causal mechanisms of psychosis risk.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ahra KimDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minji HaDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taekwan KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sunghyun ParkDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Silvia Kyungjin LhoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Young MoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minah KimDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Soo KwonDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea Brain Research Institute 21-BR-03-01Ministry of Science and ICTNational Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1C1C1002457National Research Foundation of Korea 2020M3E5D9079910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the triple-network model, the salience network (SN) plays a crucial role in switching between the default-mode network (DMN) and the central executive network (CEN). Aberrant patterns of triple-network connectivity have been reported in schizophrenia patients, while findings have been less consistent for patients in the early stages of psychotic disorders. Thus, the present study examined the connectivity among the SN, DMN, and CEN in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis.

methodsThirty-nine patients with FEP, 78 patients with CHR for psychosis, and 110 healthy controls (HCs) underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the SN, DMN, and CEN connectivity patterns of the three groups. The role of the SN in networks with significant connectivity differences was examined by mediation analysis.

resultsFEP patients showed lower SN-DMN and SN-CEN (cluster-level F=5.83, false discovery rate [FDR] corrected-p=0.001) connectivity than HCs. There was lower SN-DMN connectivity (cluster-level F=3.06, FDR corrected-p=0.053) at a trend level in CHR subjects compared to HCs. Between HCs and FEP patients, mediation analysis showed that SN-DMN connectivity was a mediator between group and SN-CEN connectivity. Additionally, SN-CEN connectivity functioned as a mediator between group and SN-DMN connectivity.

conclusionAberrant connectivity between the SN and DMN/CEN suggests disrupted network switching in FEP patients, although CHR subjects showed trend-level SN-DMN dysconnectivity. Our findings suggest that dysfunctional triple-network dynamics centered on the SN can appear in patients in the early stages of psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

Clinical high riskFirst-episode psychosisSalience networkSchizophreniaTriple-network connectivity

Identifiers

PMID36588438
PMCPMC9806514
OpenAlexW4313261960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.