Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588391›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2023

Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality in hypertensive patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery.

Amir Hossein Behnoush, Amirmohammad Khalaji, Malihe Rezaee, Shahram Momtahen, Soheil Mansourian, Jamshid Bagheri, Farzad Masoudkabir, Kaveh Hosseini

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amir Hossein BehnoushTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-4227
Amirmohammad KhalajiTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-1914
Malihe RezaeeTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahram MomtahenDepartment of Surgery, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soheil MansourianDepartment of Surgery, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jamshid BagheriDepartment of Surgery, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad MasoudkabirTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kaveh HosseiniTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-3099
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) has shown promising results in all fields of medicine, including preventive cardiology. Hypertensive patients are at higher risk of mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery; thus, we aimed to design and evaluate five ML models to predict 1-year mortality among hypertensive patients who underwent CABG. HYOTHESIS: ML algorithms can significantly improve mortality prediction after CABG.

methodsTehran Heart Center's CABG data registry was used to extract several baseline and peri-procedural characteristics and mortality data. The best features were chosen using random forest (RF) feature selection algorithm. Five ML models were developed to predict 1-year mortality: logistic regression (LR), RF, artificial neural network (ANN), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and naïve Bayes (NB). The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models.

resultsAmong the 8,493 hypertensive patients who underwent CABG (mean age of 68.27 ± 9.27 years), 303 died in the first year. Eleven features were selected as the best predictors, among which total ventilation hours and ejection fraction were the leading ones. LR showed the best prediction ability with an AUC of 0.82, while the least AUC was for the NB model (0.79). Among the subgroups, the highest AUC for LR model was for two age range groups (50-59 and 80-89 years), overweight, diabetic, and smoker subgroups of hypertensive patients.

conclusionsAll ML models had excellent performance in predicting 1-year mortality among CABG hypertension patients, while LR was the best regarding AUC. These models can help clinicians assess the risk of mortality in specific subgroups at higher risk (such as hypertensive ones).

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassHypertensionAgedBayes TheoremHumansIranMachine LearningMiddle Agedcoronary artery bypasshypertensionmachine learningmortalityprediction

Identifiers

PMID36588391
PMCPMC10018097
OpenAlexW4313388080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.