Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588330›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Healthcare professionals' perception of safety culture and the Operating Room (OR) Black Box technology before clinical implementation: a cross-sectional survey.

Jeanett Strandbygaard, Nynne Dose, Kjestine Emilie Moeller, Lauren Gordon, Eliane Shore, Susanne Rosthøj, Bent Ottesen, Teodor Grantcharov, Jette Led Sorensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeanett StrandbygaardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark jeanett.strandbygaard@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0865-2460
Nynne DoseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Kjestine Emilie MoellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lauren GordonDivision of Vascular Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eliane ShoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-7858
Susanne RosthøjDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent OttesenJuliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Teodor GrantcharovDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Excellence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jette Led SorensenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKSt. Michael's Hospital · CACopenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComprehensive data capture systems such as the Operating Room Black Box (OR Black Box) are becoming more widely implemented to access quality data in the complex environment of the OR. Prior to installing an OR Black Box, we assessed perceptions on safety attitudes, impostor phenomenon and privacy concerns around digital information sharing among healthcare professionals in the OR. A parallel survey was conducted in Canada, hence, this study also discusses cultural and international differences when implementing new technology in healthcare.

methodsA cross-sectional survey using three previously validated questionnaires (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, Dispositional Privacy Concern) was distributed through Research Electronic Data Capture to 145 healthcare professionals from the OR (July to December 2019). Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance were used to test for differences.

results124 responded (86%): 100 completed the survey (69%) (38 nurses, 10 anaesthesiologists, 36 obstetricians/gynaecologists, 16 residents). Significant variability in all six SAQ domains, safety climate and teamwork being the lowest ranked and job satisfaction ranked highest for all groups. The SAQ varied in all domains in Canada. Moderate to frequent impostor phenomenon was experienced by 71% predominantly among residents (p=0.003). 72% in the Canadian study. Residents were most comfortable with digital information sharing (p<0.001), only 13% of all healthcare professionals were concerned/heavy concerned compared with 45% in Canada.

conclusionsThe different healthcare professional groups had diverse perceptions about safety culture, but were mainly concerned about safety climate and teamwork in the OR. Impostor phenomenon decreased with age. All groups were unconcerned about digital information sharing. The Canadian study had similar findings in terms of impostor phenomenon, but a variety within the SAQ and were more concerned about data safety, which could be due to medical litigation per se and is not widespread in Scandinavia compared with North America.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsOrganizational CultureAnxiety DisordersAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerceptionSafety ManagementSelf ConceptAnaesthesiaAttitudesContinuous quality improvementHealthcare quality improvementObstetrics and gynecology

Identifiers

PMID36588330
PMCPMC9730368
OpenAlexW4310803177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.