ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Prescribing patterns of low vision devices in patients with cone-related dystrophies.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorimetric and Photobiological Properties of Light Transmitted Through Low-Vision Filters: Simulated Potential Impact on ipRGCs Responses Considering Crystalline Lens Aging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Commentary: Low vision devices are boon to patients with visual impairment due to retinal dystrophies.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to elucidate the type of low vision devices (LVDs) prescribed for patients with cone dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, and rod-cone dystrophy and to analyze the visual improvement with the devices. Methods: A retrospective review of 300 electronic medical records of patients with cone dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, and rod-cone dystrophy referred to the low vision care (LVC) clinic for the first time between 2014 and 2016 at a tertiary eye care center was done. Collected data included the demographic profile of patients, details of LVDs, and best-corrected vision. Results: Out of 300 patients, 62.6% (n = 188) were male and 37.3% (n = 112) were female. Of the cases, 50% (n = 150) had cone-rod dystrophy, 45% (n = 135) had cone dystrophy, and 5% (n = 15) had rod-cone dystrophy. The most commonly prescribed LVD was SEE-TV binocular telescope (n = 6, 2.0%) for distance and dome magnifier (n = 60, 20%) for near. ET-40 dark grey tint (20.6%) was preferred for managing photophobia. There was a statistically significant difference in both distance and near visual acuities with LVDs (P < 0.05) in all categories, except rod-cone dystrophy. Conclusion: Early diagnosis with appropriate prescription of LVDs including tints helps in achieving good quality of vision in patients with cone-related dystrophies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.