ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Factors affecting the epithelial integrity of human donor corneas.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate various factors affecting the integrity of human donor corneal epithelium. Methods: Donor corneal buttons were evaluated for epithelial defect (ED) and exposure. The slit-lamp photographs were taken on day 01, and the data such as age and gender of the donor, cause of death, refrigeration of cadavers, death-to-preservation time (DPT), experience of technician, and distance from site of collection to eye bank were collected. Results: A total of 100 consecutive corneal buttons belonging to 56 donors were evaluated. The median age of donors was 50 years. Males constituted 45 (80.4%). The mean DPT was 9.7 ± 5.3 hours. After death, 34 donors (60.7%) were refrigerated before the collection/retrieval. Most of the corneas (80%) were recovered by technicians having an experience of 0-5 years. Thirty-one donors (55.3%) were located at 1-50 km from the eye bank. The mean area of exposure was 15 ± 4.3 mm Conclusion: Integrity of donor corneal epithelium is mainly influenced by the refrigeration of cadavers and DPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.