ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Secondary glaucoma following vitreo-retinal surgeries.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and pathophysiological insights into optic neuropathy after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A literature review.European journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Case report: Central retinal artery occlusion following scleral buckling surgery with secondary angle closure and recurrent acute ocular hypertension.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical Success and Predictive Factors in Patients Undergoing Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical and epidemiological features of secondary glaucoma in a Mexican Tertiary Ophthalmology Hospital.International ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Efficacy of ultrasound cyclo-plasty in patients with refractory glaucoma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Updates on Treatment Modalities for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Challenges of Secondary Glaucoma Management Following Congenital Cataract Surgery, Penetrating Keratoplasty and Vitreoretinal Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Commentary: Glaucoma complicating vitreoretinal surgery!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitreoretinal surgeries either in the form of external compression by buckles or by increasing the intraocular volume by tamponades can cause a significant rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), causing glaucoma to be one of the most common consequences of vitreoretinal surgeries despite improved surgical techniques. Identifying the mechanism that causes the raised IOP is crucial as the management of glaucoma can differ accordingly. Intravitreal (IVT) injections in the form of IVT steroids or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections can also cause a significant rise in the IOP and effect, especially the glaucomatous eyes, which are already predisposed. Not just the overlapping clinical features make the diagnosis confusing but also associated scarring of the conjunctiva, and the presence of episcleral hardware in some cases due to scleral buckle make the surgical management of glaucoma in these eyes very challenging. In this review, we describe in detail the various mechanisms causing secondary glaucoma post vitreoretinal surgeries with a focus on how to distinguish between them. We also discuss the possible consequences of anti-VEGF agents on IOP, various surgical challenges, and modifications with newer surgical options in the management of this refractory glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.