SynthesisUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2023
The efficiency of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) combined with EUS elastography for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing the Pancreatic Tumor Diagnosis: Emerging Trends in Imaging Technologies: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: Recent Trends and Advances.Cancers · 2026Review
- Live and learn: unexpected benign disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Prediction Model of Malignant Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound elastography in solid pancreatic lesions: individual and combined performance of strain ratio, fat-lesion strain ratio, and mean strain histogram for diagnosing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatology: Focus on Normal Variants and Pancreatic Masses.Visceral medicine · 2023Review
- Detective flow imagingEndoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography combined with contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy among solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs).
methodsA comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 1991 through December 2020. The pooled performance characteristics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (OR), were calculated using Meta-DiSc 1.4.
resultsIn total, 430 patients with 282 pancreatic malignancies were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and diagnostic OR were 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80% to 88%), 85% (95% CI, 78% to 90%), 5.31 (95% CI, 2.57 to 10.97), 0.15 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.34), and 67.72 (95% CI, 12.84 to 357.26) for the combination of CE-EUS and EUS elastography, respectively. In these same studies, the corresponding performance characteristics for EUS elastography were 87% (95% CI, 82% to 90%), 56% (95% CI, 48% to 64%), 2.28 (95% CI, 1.43 to 3.63), 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.42), and 22.60 (95% CI, 5.81 to 87.92), respectively. In these same studies, the respective performance characteristics for CE-EUS were 84% (95% CI, 80% to 88%), 78% (95% CI, 70% to 84%), 3.80 (95% CI, 1.92 to 7.53), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.41), and 31.29 (95% CI, 6.12 to 159.87).
conclusionCE-EUS and EUS elastography are reliable supplemental techniques for the characterization of SPLs and diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. However, more studies assessing the combined utilization of both procedures are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.