Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2023
Nonsurgical treatment for upper eyelid retraction in patients with inactive Graves' orbitopathy.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Therapy for Graves' Ophthalmopathy-Associated Eyelid Retraction: Steroid, 5-FU, and Botulinum Neurotoxin a Combination.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Ocular Surface Irritation Symptoms in Inactive Mild and Moderate-to-Severe Graves' Orbitopathy.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- An ensemble deep learning diagnostic system for determining Clinical Activity Scores in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: integrating multi-view multimodal images from anterior segment slit-lamp photographs and facial images.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin
methodsThis is a comparative, prospective study, conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, EUGOGO site (EUropean Group On Graves' Orbitopathy) in Croatia from January 2020 till January of 2021 in accordance with national health headquarter recommendations. All patients were classified as inactive with marked eyelid retraction and randomly divided into groups according to application sites. Group A underwent transconjunctival application (18 eyes) and group B transcutaneous application (20 eyes) of incobotulinumtoxinA. The primary end point of this study was lowering the eyelid, to alleviate anterior eye segment symptoms and achieve acceptable aesthetic appearance until surgery becomes available.
resultsThere were no nonresponders and we found no statistically significant difference in the degree of lowering the eyelid between the two application sites. Following rules for avoiding spread of SARS-CoV-19, none of the patients included in this study were infected. Moreover, participants reported diminishing of anterior eye segment irritation and improved aesthetics.
conclusionTreatment of inactive GO patients with incobotulinumtoxinA for upper eyelid retraction is efficient and safe and can be used as an adjuvant treatment while patients wait for surgery, by alleviating symptoms and improving the level of aesthetic satisfaction without causing a threat to anterior eye segment and visual function. The study showed that effect of treatment was the same, whether we applied the toxin transconjunctivaly or transcutaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.