Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36587289›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Interactions between the aging brain and motor task complexity across the lifespan: balancing brain activity resource demand and supply.

P Van Ruitenbeek, T Santos Monteiro, S Chalavi, B R King, K Cuypers, S Sunaert, R Peeters, S P Swinnen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

P Van RuitenbeekKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
T Santos MonteiroKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
S ChalaviKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
B R KingKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3010-8755
K CuypersKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
S SunaertKU Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences, UZ Herestraat 49, box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
R PeetersKU Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences, UZ Herestraat 49, box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
S P SwinnenKU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Biomedical Sciences,Tervuursevest 101, box 1501, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEHasselt University · BEMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Compensation Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis (CRUNCH) proposes a framework for understanding task-related brain activity changes as a function of healthy aging and task complexity. Specifically, it affords the following predictions: (i) all adult age groups display more brain activation with increases in task complexity, (ii) older adults show more brain activation compared with younger adults at low task complexity levels, and (iii) disproportionately increase brain activation with increased task complexity, but (iv) show smaller (or no) increases in brain activation at the highest complexity levels. To test these hypotheses, performance on a bimanual tracking task at 4 complexity levels and associated brain activation were assessed in 3 age groups (20-40, 40-60, and 60-80 years, n = 99). All age groups showed decreased tracking accuracy and increased brain activation with increased task complexity, with larger performance decrements and activation increases in the older age groups. Older adults exhibited increased brain activation at a lower complexity level, but not the predicted failure to further increase brain activity at the highest complexity level. We conclude that older adults show more brain activation than younger adults and preserve the capacity to deploy increased neural resources as a function of task demand.

Indexed as

BrainLongevityMagnetic Resonance Imagingagingbrain activationCRUNCHsensori-motor control

Identifiers

PMID36587289
PMCPMC10183738
OpenAlexW4313379667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.