Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36587181›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

On the role of tail in stability and energetic cost of bird flapping flight.

Gianmarco Ducci, Gennaro Vitucci, Philippe Chatelain, Renaud Ronsse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gianmarco DucciInstitute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. gianmarco.ducci@uclouvain.be.
Gennaro VitucciInstitute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Philippe ChatelainInstitute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Renaud RonsseInstitute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migratory birds travel over impressively long distances. Consequently, they have to adopt flight regimes being both efficient-in order to spare their metabolic resources-and robust to perturbations. This paper investigates the relationship between both aspects, i.e., energetic performance and stability, in flapping flight of migratory birds. Relying on a poly-articulated wing morphing model and a tail-like surface, several families of steady flight regime have been identified and analysed. These families differ by their wing kinematics and tail opening. A systematic parametric search analysis has been carried out, in order to evaluate power consumption and cost of transport. A framework tailored for assessing limit cycles, namely Floquet theory, is used to numerically study flight stability. Our results show that under certain conditions, an inherent passive stability of steady and level flight can be achieved. In particular, we find that progressively opening the tail leads to passively stable flight regimes. Within these passively stable regimes, the tail can produce either upward or downward lift. However, these configurations entail an increase of cost of transport at high velocities penalizing fast forward flight regimes. Our model-based predictions suggest that long range flights require a furled tail configuration, as confirmed by field observations, and consequently need to rely on alternative mechanisms to stabilize the flight.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID36587181
PMCPMC9805461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.