ArticleScientific reports2022
A pathway analysis-based algorithm for calculating the participation degree of ncRNA in transcriptome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel load balancing mechanism for cloud networks using dilated and attention-based federated learning with Coati Optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After sequencing, it is common to screen ncRNA according to expression differences. But this may lose a lot of valuable information and there is currently no indicator to characterize the regulatory function and participation degree of ncRNA on transcriptome. Based on existing pathway enrichment methods, we developed a new algorithm to calculating the participation degree of ncRNA in transcriptome (PDNT). Here we analyzed multiple data sets, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were used for pathway enrichment analysis. The PDNT algorithm was used to calculate the Contribution value (C value) of each ncRNA based on its target genes and the pathways they participates in. The results showed that compared with ncRNAs screened by log2 fold change (FC) and p-value, those screened by C value regulated more DEGs in IPA canonical pathways, and their target DEGs were more concentrated in the core region of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. The ranking of disease critical ncRNAs increased integrally after sorting with C value. Collectively, we found that the PDNT algorithm provides a measure from another view compared with the log2FC and p-value and it may provide more clues to effectively evaluate ncRNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.