Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36587047›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens.

Nampalle Mukesh Tukaram, Avishek Biswas, Chandra Deo, Agashe Jayanti Laxman, Madheshwaran Monika, Ashok Kumar Tiwari

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Dietary heat-killedVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nampalle Mukesh TukaramNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Avishek BiswasNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India. drbiswas007@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1439-2477
Chandra DeoNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Agashe Jayanti LaxmanNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Madheshwaran MonikaNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Ashok Kumar TiwariNutrition and Feed Technology Division, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Central Avian Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to determine the effects of dietary paraprobiotic (PPB) on broiler chicken performance, immunity, gut health, and carcass traits. A total of 240 day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of identical body weight randomly divided into six treatment groups, each with five replicates and eight chicks in each replicate. Six dietary treatments were preapared: T

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChickensAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsWeight GainAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36587047
PMCPMC9805422
OpenAlexW4313396955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.