ArticleJASA express letters2022
Defining functional spatial boundaries using a spatial release from masking task.
Article in JASA express letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural head orientation and spatial hearing with symmetric frontal maskers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A fast measure of spatial separation for release from masking and its relation to intelligibility.JASA express letters · 2025Article
- Simultaneous relative cue reliance in speech-on-speech masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classic spatial release from masking (SRM) task measures speech recognition thresholds for discrete separation angles between a target and masker. Alternatively, this study used a modified SRM task that adaptively measured the spatial-separation angle needed between a continuous male target stream (speech with digits) and two female masker streams to achieve a specific SRM. On average, 20 young normal-hearing listeners needed less spatial separation for 6 dB release than 9 dB release, and the presence of background babble reduced across-listener variability on the paradigm. Future work is needed to better understand the psychometric properties of this adaptive procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.