Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36586857›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.

Kristin J Van Engen, Avanti Dey, Mitchell S Sommers, Jonathan E Peelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Primitive audiovisual integration of speech.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  8. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Reassessing the Benefits of Audiovisual Integration to Speech Perception and Intelligibility.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristin J Van EngenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Avanti DeyPLOS ONE, 1265 Battery Street, San Francisco, California 94111, USA.
Mitchell S SommersDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Jonathan E PeelleDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

Funding

THE NEUROCOGNITIVE BASIS OF EFFORTFUL LISTENING - Administrative supplement for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01DC014281 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PEELLE, JONATHAN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION, AGE, AND HEARING LOSSR01DC016594 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TYE-MURRAY, NANCY ANN · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Individual differences in brain networks supporting speech understanding in patientswith cochlear implantsR01DC019507 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan E Peelle · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014281NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016594NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is clear that sighted listeners use both auditory and visual cues during speech perception, the manner in which multisensory information is combined is a matter of debate. One approach to measuring multisensory integration is to use variants of the McGurk illusion, in which discrepant auditory and visual cues produce auditory percepts that differ from those based on unimodal input. Not all listeners show the same degree of susceptibility to the McGurk illusion, and these individual differences are frequently used as a measure of audiovisual integration ability. However, despite their popularity, we join the voices of others in the field to argue that McGurk tasks are ill-suited for studying real-life multisensory speech perception: McGurk stimuli are often based on isolated syllables (which are rare in conversations) and necessarily rely on audiovisual incongruence that does not occur naturally. Furthermore, recent data show that susceptibility to McGurk tasks does not correlate with performance during natural audiovisual speech perception. Although the McGurk effect is a fascinating illusion, truly understanding the combined use of auditory and visual information during speech perception requires tasks that more closely resemble everyday communication: namely, words, sentences, and narratives with congruent auditory and visual speech cues.

Indexed as

IllusionsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansLanguagePhotic StimulationSpeechVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID36586857
PMCPMC9894660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.