Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36586855›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young noise-exposed Veterans.

Naomi F Bramhall, Sean D Kampel, Kelly M Reavis, Dawn Konrad-Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi F BramhallVeterans Affairs (VA) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-5322
Sean D KampelVeterans Affairs (VA) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Kelly M ReavisVeterans Affairs (VA) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Dawn Konrad-MartinVeterans Affairs (VA) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
VA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

RRD VA I01 RX003804RRD VA I50 RX002361RRD VA IK2 RX002104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although animal models show a clear link between noise exposure and damage to afferent cochlear synapses, the relationship between noise exposure and efferent function appears to be more complex. Animal studies indicate that high intensity noise exposure reduces efferent medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex strength, whereas chronic moderate noise exposure is associated with a conditioning effect that enhances the MOC reflex. The MOC reflex is predicted to improve speech-in-noise perception and protects against noise-induced auditory damage by reducing cochlear gain. In humans, MOC reflex strength can be estimated by measuring contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of military noise exposure on efferent auditory function by measuring DPOAE contralateral inhibition in young Veterans and non-Veterans with normal audiograms. Compared with non-Veteran controls, Veterans with high levels of reported noise exposure demonstrated a trend of reduced contralateral inhibition across a broad frequency range, suggesting efferent damage. Veterans with moderate noise exposure showed trends of reduced inhibition from 3 to 4 kHz but greater inhibition from 1 to 1.5 kHz, consistent with conditioning. These findings suggest that, in humans, the impact of noise exposure on the MOC reflex differs depending on the noise intensity and duration.

Indexed as

HearingOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCochleaHumansNoiseOlivary Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID36586855
PMCPMC10857792
OpenAlexW4311735590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.