Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36586228›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2023

SARS-CoV-2 proteases Mpro and PLpro: Design of inhibitors with predicted high potency and low mammalian toxicity using artificial neural networks, ligand-protein docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and ADMET calculations.

Roman S Tumskiy, Anastasiia V Tumskaia, Iraida N Klochkova, Rudy J Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A potential allosteric inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (MFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roman S TumskiyInstitute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants and Microorganisms - Subdivision of the Federal State Budgetary Research Institution Saratov Federal Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBPPM RAS), 13 Prospekt Entuziastov, Saratov, 410049, Russia.
Anastasiia V TumskaiaChemistry Institute, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya Str, Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Iraida N KlochkovaChemistry Institute, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya Str, Saratov, 410012, Russia.
Rudy J RichardsonToxicology Program, Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Center of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Michigan Institute for Data Science, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: rjrich@umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main (Mpro) and papain-like (PLpro) proteases are highly conserved viral proteins essential for replication of the COVID-19 virus, SARS-COV-2. Therefore, a logical plan for producing new drugs against this pathogen is to discover inhibitors of these enzymes. Accordingly, the goal of the present work was to devise a computational approach to design, characterize, and select compounds predicted to be potent dual inhibitors - effective against both Mpro and PLpro. The first step employed LigDream, an artificial neural network, to create a virtual ligand library. Ligands with computed ADMET profiles indicating drug-like properties and low mammalian toxicity were selected for further study. Initial docking of these ligands into the active sites of Mpro and PLpro was done with GOLD, and the highest-scoring ligands were redocked with AutoDock Vina to determine binding free energies (ΔG). Compounds 89-00, 89-07, 89-32, and 89-38 exhibited favorable ΔG values for Mpro (-7.6 to -8.7 kcal/mol) and PLpro (-9.1 to -9.7 kcal/mol). Global docking of selected compounds with the Mpro dimer identified prospective allosteric inhibitors 89-00, 89-27, and 89-40 (ΔG -8.2 to -8.9 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulations performed on Mpro and PLpro active site complexes with the four top-scoring ligands from Vina demonstrated that the most stable complexes were formed with compounds 89-32 and 89-38. Overall, the present computational strategy generated new compounds with predicted drug-like characteristics, low mammalian toxicity, and high inhibitory potencies against both target proteases to form stable complexes. Further preclinical studies will be required to validate the in silico findings before the lead compounds could be considered for clinical trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19Peptide HydrolasesAnimalsLigandsMammalsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesProtease InhibitorsSARS-CoV-2LigandsPeptide HydrolasesProtease InhibitorsADMETCOVID-19Heterocyclic compoundsIn silico drug designMolecular dockingMolecular dynamics simulationMpro/PLpro inhibitorsNirmatrelvirPyrazolopyridazinesTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID36586228
PMCPMC9788855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.