Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36586054›Full record

ReviewMaternal and child health journal2023

The Architecture of Early Childhood Sleep Over the First Two Years.

Sonia Marie Lenehan, Leanna Fogarty, Cathal O'Connor, Sean Mathieson, Geraldine B Boylan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03731195 (GentleTouch), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03731195 completednot on this map

GentleTouch (Study to Evaluate Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Responses to Affective Touch and How it Develops in Healthy Term Babies)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College CorkRan2018 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsPleasant Touch, Cortical Response
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in sleep diagnostics for children under 2 years of age: state of the evidence and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Early-life NOThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. REM refines and rescues memory representations: a new theory.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sonia Marie LenehanINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. sonia.lenehan@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4006-1329
Leanna FogartyINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Cathal O'ConnorINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-5293
Sean MathiesonINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Geraldine B BoylanINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board 223047/Z/21/ZIrish Clinical Academic Training (ICAT) Program 223047/Z/21/Zirish research council for science, engineering and technology GOIPG/2020/309Science Foundation Ireland 12/RC/2272Wellcome Trust 223047/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe architecture and function of sleep during infancy and early childhood has not been fully described in the scientific literature. The impact of early sleep disruption on cognitive and physical development is also under-studied. The aim of this review was to investigate early childhood sleep development over the first two years and its association with neurodevelopment.

methodsThis review was conducted according to the 2009 PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (OVID Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched according to predefined search terms.

resultsNinety-three studies with approximately 90,000 subjects from demographically diverse backgrounds were included in this review. Sleep is the predominant state at birth. There is an increase in NREM and a decrease in REM sleep during the first two years. Changes in sleep architecture occur in tandem with development. There are more studies exploring sleep and early infancy compared to mid and late infancy and early childhood. DISCUSSION: Sleep is critical for memory, learning, and socio-emotional development. Future longitudinal studies in infants and young children should focus on sleep architecture at each month of life to establish the emergence of key characteristics, especially from 7-24 months of age, during periods of rapid neurodevelopmental progress.

Indexed as

SleepSleep, REMChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesParturitionPregnancyEarly childhoodInfant sleepNeurodevelopmentNREMREMSleep deprivationSleep–wake cycleTerm infants

Identifiers

PMID36586054
PMCPMC9925493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.