ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2023
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Usefulness of Low-Kiloelectron Volt Virtual Monochromatic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Technique in Improving the Delineation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- First study on the efficiency ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Nuclear Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Compared to New Alternative Imaging Methods.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficiency of a novel lymph node radiotracer
methodsA retrospective study was performed on 533 patients with CMM who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB. All patients received a preoperative peritumoral injection of 11.1-18.5 MBq of
resultsThe detection rate of lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB was both 99.81% (532/533), and the average number of detected SLNs was 2.1 (range 1 to 8) and 2.7 (range 1 to 11) per patient, respectively. 12.1% SLNs and 22.2% patients were found metastatic, with an average of 1.5 (range 1 to 5) metastatic SLNs per patient. The SLN metastatic rates were different in patients with different Breslow thickness, Clark levels, ulceration, mitotic counts, and HMB45 expression (p < 0.05). Ninety patients were proceeded with the regional lymph node dissection (RLND) after SLNB, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SLNB in metastatic diagnosis is 97.4, 100 and 96.7%, respectively. And SLNs with metastases was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS by multivariate prognostic analyses (HR was 5.9 and 4.3, p < 0.001). For patients with metastatic SLNs, the non-SLNs with metastasis and non-SLNs without metastasis in RLND, and observation groups showed different mean PFS as 14.9, 24.8 and 25.5 months (p = 0.018), but no statistically significant difference existed in the OS.
conclusionThe novel radiotracer
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.