Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36586006›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

Advancements in the future of automating micromanipulation techniques in the IVF laboratory using deep convolutional neural networks.

Victoria S Jiang, Deeksha Kartik, Prudhvi Thirumalaraju, Hemanth Kandula, Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy, Irene Souter, Irene Dimitriadis, Charles L Bormann, Hadi Shafiee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria S JiangDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Suite 10A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0625-1399
Deeksha KartikDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Prudhvi ThirumalarajuDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-0243
Hemanth KandulaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-6727
Manoj Kumar KanakasabapathyDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-8585
Irene SouterDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Suite 10A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-5438
Irene DimitriadisDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Suite 10A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Charles L BormannDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Suite 10A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. CBORMANN@PARTNERS.ORG.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3377-972X
Hadi ShafieeDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. hshafiee@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-7648

Funding

A smartphone-enabled point-of-care HCV Ag diagnostic using catalytic nanoparticles and AI-enhanced image processingR01EB033866 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2022 to 2025
$3.3M
Microchip for HBV testing using HIV-infected blood samplesR01AI138800 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
A mobile health diagnostic device for HIV self-testingR33AI140489 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2022 to 2023
$1.8M
A mobile health diagnostic device for HIV self-testingR61AI140489 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2019 to 2021
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138800NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI140489NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI140489NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if deep learning artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to accurately identify key morphologic landmarks on oocytes and cleavage stage embryo images for micromanipulation procedures such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or assisted hatching (AH).

methodsTwo convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained, validated, and tested over three replicates to identify key morphologic landmarks used to guide embryologists when performing micromanipulation procedures. The first model (CNN-ICSI) was trained (n = 13,992), validated (n = 1920), and tested (n = 3900) to identify the optimal location for ICSI through polar body identification. The second model (CNN-AH) was trained (n = 13,908), validated (n = 1908), and tested (n = 3888) to identify the optimal location for AH on the zona pellucida that maximizes distance from healthy blastomeres.

resultsThe CNN-ICSI model accurately identified the polar body and corresponding optimal ICSI location with 98.9% accuracy (95% CI 98.5-99.2%) with a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) with micro and macro area under the curves (AUC) of 1. The CNN-AH model accurately identified the optimal AH location with 99.41% accuracy (95% CI 99.11-99.62%) with a ROC with micro and macro AUCs of 1.

conclusionDeep CNN models demonstrate powerful potential in accurately identifying key landmarks on oocytes and cleavage stage embryos for micromanipulation. These findings are novel, essential stepping stones in the automation of micromanipulation procedures.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFertilization in VitroAnimalsMaleMicromanipulationNeural Networks, ComputerSemenArtificial intelligenceAssisted hatchingAssisted reproductive technologyICSIMachine learningMicromanipulation

Identifiers

PMID36586006
PMCPMC9935764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.