ArticleJournal of medical systems2022
Improving Hospital Outpatient Clinics Appointment Schedules by Prediction Models.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decision-making for pediatric vaccination scheduling under multiple constraints: a case study from ChinaFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Analysis of the anti-scalping mechanism of hospital appointment registration based on Bayesian theory.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A Survey on Digital Solutions for Health Services Management: Features and Use Cases from Brazilian National Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patient no-shows and suboptimal patient appointment length scheduling reduce clinical efficiency and impair the clinic's quality of service. The main objective of this study is to improve appointment scheduling in hospital outpatient clinics. We developed generic supervised machine learning models to predict patient no-shows and patient's length of appointment (LOA). We performed a retrospective study using more than 100,000 records of patient appointments in a hospital outpatient clinic. Several machine learning algorithms were used for the development of our prediction models. We trained our models on a dataset that contained patients', physicians', and appointments' characteristics. Our feature set combines both unstudied features and features adopted from previous studies. In addition, we identified the influential features for predicting LOA and no-show. Our LOA model's performance was 6.92 in terms of MAE, and our no-show model's performance was 92.1% in terms of F-score. We compared our models' performance to the performance of previous research models by applying their methods to our dataset; our models demonstrated better performance. We show that the major effector of such differences is the use of our novel features. To evaluate the effect of our prediction results on the quality of schedules produced by appointment systems (AS), we developed an interface layer between our prediction models and the AS, where prediction results comprise the AS input. Using our prediction models, there was an 80% improvement in the daily cumulative patient waiting time and a 33% reduction in the daily cumulative physician idle time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.