Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36585732›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research : BCR2022

Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.

Akila Anandarajah, Yongzhen Chen, Graham A Colditz, Angela Hardi, Carolyn Stoll, Shu Jiang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akila AnandarajahDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave MSC 8100-0094-2200, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Yongzhen ChenSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave MSC 8100-0094-2200, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Angela HardiBernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, MSC 8132-12-01, 660 S Euclid Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Carolyn StollDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave MSC 8100-0094-2200, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Shu JiangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave MSC 8100-0094-2200, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. Jiang.shu@wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Dynamic prediction incorporating time-varying covariates for the onset of breast cancerR37CA256810 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, SHU · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R37 CA256810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to assess the methods used to classify mammographic breast parenchymal features in relation to the prediction of future breast cancer. The databases including Medline (Ovid) 1946-, Embase.com 1947-, CINAHL Plus 1937-, Scopus 1823-, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through October 2021 to extract published articles in English describing the relationship of parenchymal texture features with the risk of breast cancer. Twenty-eight articles published since 2016 were included in the final review. The identification of parenchymal texture features varied from using a predefined list to machine-driven identification. A reduction in the number of features chosen for subsequent analysis in relation to cancer incidence then varied across statistical approaches and machine learning methods. The variation in approach and number of features identified for inclusion in analysis precluded generating a quantitative summary or meta-analysis of the value of these features to improve predicting risk of future breast cancers. This updated overview of the state of the art revealed research gaps; based on these, we provide recommendations for future studies using parenchymal features for mammogram images to make use of accumulating image data, and external validation of prediction models that extend to 5 and 10 years to guide clinical risk management. Following these recommendations could enhance the applicability of models, helping improve risk classification and risk prediction for women to tailor screening and prevention strategies to the level of risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreast DensityFemaleHumansMammographyRisk AssessmentBreast densityMammographyParenchymal patternsRisk predictionTexture

Identifiers

PMID36585732
PMCPMC9805242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.