ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022
Safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective study.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Weekly cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increases pathological complete response in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Application of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in the structural modification of natural products: a review.Molecular diversity · 2025Review
- Article
- Application of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in curative surgery for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Correction to: Safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWe evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) or carboplatin (TC) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-center retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4aNanyM0) receiving NCRT plus curative-intent esophagectomy with TP or TC regimen. The primary endpoints were grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) and overall survival (OS). AEs were compared using a t-test according to CTCAE 4.0. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test; the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsWe included 151 and 50 patients in the TC and TP groups, respectively. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups. The TP group exhibited significantly higher hematologic and non-hematologic AEs than the TC group, and the noticeable difference was the incidence of febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher (P = 0.011). No significant intergroup differences were noted considering postoperative complications, resection margins, or pathological complete remission rate (all P > 0.05). OS and progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between groups. The estimated 3-year OS and PFS rates were 65.1% versus 69.4% and 58.4% versus 53.5% for TP and TC groups, respectively.
conclusionIn patients with LA-ESCC, we recommend TC, not TP, as an optimal chemotherapy regimen for NCRT, given its superiorsafety profile and comparable efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.