Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36585700›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Conversion of unresponsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibition by fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with metastatic melanoma: study protocol for a randomized phase Ib/IIa trial.

J S W Borgers, F H Burgers, E M Terveer, M E van Leerdam, C M Korse, R Kessels, C C Flohil, C U Blank, T N Schumacher, M van Dijk and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05251389 (Conversion of Unresponsiveness to Immunotherapy by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05251389 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this map

Conversion of Unresponsiveness to Immunotherapy by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma: a Randomized Phase Ib/IIa Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2022 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsMelanoma Stage III, Melanoma Stage IVArmsFecal microbiota transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. COPD-Lung Cancer Comorbidity: Mechanistic Insights and Precision Oncology Implications.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The future of affordable cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J S W Borgers *Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F H Burgers *Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E M TerveerNetherlands Donor Feces Bank, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M E van LeerdamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C M KorseDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R KesselsDepartment of Biometrics, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C C FlohilDepartment of Pathology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C U BlankDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T N SchumacherDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van DijkClinical Trial Service Unit, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J G E HenderickxCenter for Microbiome Analyses and Therapeutics at Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J J KellerNetherlands Donor Feces Bank, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H W VerspagetNetherlands Donor Feces Bank, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E J KuijperNetherlands Donor Feces Bank, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J B A G HaanenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.haanen@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiome plays an important role in immune modulation. Specifically, presence or absence of certain gut bacterial taxa has been associated with better antitumor immune responses. Furthermore, in trials using fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) to treat melanoma patients unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), complete responses (CR), partial responses (PR), and durable stable disease (SD) have been observed. However, the underlying mechanism determining which patients will or will not respond and what the optimal FMT composition is, has not been fully elucidated, and a discrepancy in microbial taxa associated with clinical response has been observed between studies. Furthermore, it is unknown whether a change in the microbiome itself, irrespective of its origin, or FMT from ICI responding donors, is required for reversion of ICI-unresponsiveness. To address this, we will transfer microbiota of either ICI responder or nonresponder metastatic melanoma patients via FMT.

methodsIn this randomized, double-blinded phase Ib/IIa trial, 24 anti-PD1-refractory patients with advanced stage cutaneous melanoma will receive an FMT from either an ICI responding or nonresponding donor, while continuing anti-PD-1 treatment. Donors will be selected from patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Two patients with a good response (≥ 30% decrease according to RECIST 1.1 within the past 24 months) and two patients with progression (≥ 20% increase according to RECIST 1.1 within the past 3 months) will be selected as ICI responding or nonresponding donors, respectively. The primary endpoint is clinical benefit (SD, PR or CR) at 12 weeks, confirmed on a CT scan at 16 weeks. The secondary endpoint is safety, defined as the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Exploratory endpoints are progression-free survival and changes in the gut microbiome, metabolome, and immune cells. DISCUSSION: Transplanting fecal microbiota to restore the patients' perturbed microbiome has proven successful in several indications. However, less is known about the potential role of FMT to improve antitumor immune response. In this trial, we aim to investigate whether administration of FMT can reverse resistance to anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with advanced stage melanoma, and whether the ICI-responsiveness of the feces donor is associated with its effectiveness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05251389 (registered 22-Feb-2022). Protocol V4.0 (08-02-2022).

Indexed as

MelanomaNeoplasms, Second PrimarySkin NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnti-PD-1FMTGut microbiomeImmunotherapyMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID36585700
PMCPMC9801532
OpenAlexW4313454951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.