Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36585672›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Exploring sustainable care pathways - a scoping review.

Eva Walderhaug Sather, Valentina Cabral Iversen, Marit Folsvik Svindseth, Paul Crawford, Frøydis Vasset

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Care pathways for pediatric surgical conditions.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva Walderhaug SatherFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. eva.walderhaug.sather@ntnu.no.
Valentina Cabral IversenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Marit Folsvik SvindsethFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Paul CrawfordFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Frøydis VassetDepartment for Health and Social Sciences, University College in Molde, Molde, Norway. froydis.p.vasset@himolde.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with mental health problems experience numerous transitions into and out of hospital.

aimThe review studies assessing clinical care pathways between psychiatric hospitalization and community health services.

methodsWe used publications between 2009-2020 to allow a broad scoping review of the published research. Sixteen review-articles were identified, 12 primary studies were chosen, both on care pathways in the transition between psychiatric hospital and community.

resultsOrganizational issues: Systems and procedures to ensure clear responsibilities and transparency at each stage of the pathways of care. RESOURCES: Information-technology in objectively improving patient outcome. Information/documentation: Providing patients with adequate structured information and documented plans at the appropriate time. Patient/families: Continuous collaborative decision-making. Clinical care and teamwork: Collaboration between mental health and other professionals to guarantee that planned activities meet patient need. ETHICAL ISSUES: Respectful communication and patient-centred, non-humiliating care.

conclusionsSystem and procedures ensure clear responsibilities and transparency. Information technology support decision-making and referral and objectively improve patient outcomes in care pathways. Collaboration between mental health and other professionals guarantee that planned activities meet patients' needs along with regular meetings sharing key information. Around-the-clock ambulant-teams important to transition success. Informed-shared decision-making between parties, support patient participation and respectful communication.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysMental HealthCommunicationDecision Making, SharedHumansPatient ParticipationCare pathwayscommunity mental healthpatient transitionpsyciatric services

Identifiers

PMID36585672
PMCPMC9801530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.