Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36585483›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of hematology2023

Selection bias in follow-up studies of stem cell transplantation survivors: an experience within the Maastricht Observational study of late effects after Stem cell trAnsplantation (MOSA).

Nicole C van Yperen, Bianca Wauben, Marjolein Wm van der Poel, Sebastian Köhler, Marleen Mj van Greevenbroek, Harry C Schouten

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole C van Yperen *Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. n_van_yperen@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1865-489X
Bianca Wauben *Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein Wm van der PoelMaastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sebastian KöhlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marleen Mj van GreevenbroekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Harry C SchoutenMaastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLTransnational University Limburg · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an important treatment for many malignant hematological and non-hematological diseases. Survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk of long-term health problems and reduced quality of life related to previous treatments. Many studies about these long-term effects have been conducted over the last decades. However, selection bias is a concern in long-term follow-up studies and little is known about the non-participating group. As part of the Maastricht Observational study of late effects after Stem cell trAnsplantation (MOSA), investigating long-term health effects by extensively phenotyping HCT survivors, we conducted a survey to characterise the non-participating group. This survey mostly focused on quality of life and physical complaints. The survey responders were generally older than the MOSA group, had more history of relapsed disease, and described their general health as bad or mediocre significantly more often than the MOSA group. Also, more deaths occurred in the group of non-participants between the start of study inclusion in 2015 and analysis of the survey results in 2021. This study suggests that a selection of higher functioning HCT survivors with a relatively better quality of life participated in this long-term follow-up study of stem cell transplantation survivors. These results could also impact the results of other long-term follow-up studies in cancer survivors, knowing that possibly an unhealthier population is missed in these studies and some long-term negative effects of treatments might be underestimated.Trial registration number: NL-48599.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationQuality of LifeDisease ProgressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansSelection BiasSurvivorsHematopoietic stem cell transplantationLong-term follow-upQuality of lifeSelection bias

Identifiers

PMID36585483
OpenAlexW4313340093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.