Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36585316›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2023

Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting.

Kumiko O Schnock, Alison Garber, Hannah Fraser, Martha Carnie, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Anuj K Dalal, David W Bates, Ronen Rozenblum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kumiko O Schnock
Alison Garber
Hannah Fraser
Martha Carnie
Jeffrey L Schnipper
Anuj K Dalal
David W Bates
Ronen Rozenblum

Funding

Improving the Safety of Diagnosis and Therapy in the Inpatient SettingR18HS026613 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BATES, DAVID W., MD,MSC, DALAL, ANUJ K · 2018 to 2020
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS026613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic errors (DEs) have been studied extensively in ambulatory care, but less work has been done in the acute care setting. In this study, the authors examined health care providers' and patients' perspectives about the classification of DEs, the main causes and scope of DEs in acute care, the main gaps in current systems, and the need for innovative solutions.

methodsA qualitative mixed methods study was conducted, including semistructured interviews with health care providers and focus groups with patient advisors. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from the interviews and focus groups.

resultsThe research team conducted interviews with 17 providers and two focus groups with seven patient advisors. Both providers and patient advisors struggled to define and describe DEs in acute care settings. Although participants agreed that DEs pose a significant risk to patient safety, their perception of the frequency of DEs was mixed. Most participants identified communication failures, lack of comfort with diagnostic uncertainty, incorrect clinical evaluation, and cognitive load as key causes of DEs. Most respondents believed that non-information technology (IT) tools and processes (for example, communication improvement strategies) could significantly reduce DEs.

conclusionThe study findings represent an important supplement to our understanding of DEs in acute care settings and the advancement of a culture of patient safety in the context of patient-centered care and patient engagement. Health care organizations should consider the key factors identified in this study when trying to create a culture that engages clinicians and patients in reducing DEs.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatientsDiagnostic ErrorsFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID36585316
PMCPMC13011103
OpenAlexW4309931614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.