Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36584298›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Sex and age differences in "theory of mind" across 57 countries using the English version of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test.

David M Greenberg, Varun Warrier, Ahmad Abu-Akel, Carrie Allison, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Katharina Reinecke, P Jason Rentfrow, Marcin A Radecki, Simon Baron-Cohen

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The impact of sex on clinical profiles of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cross-Sectional Trajectories of Social Cognition in Later Life: Exploring Emotion Perception, Theory of Mind, and Emotional Empathy.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.

David M GreenbergInterdisciplinary Department of Social Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-1418
Varun WarrierAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-8571
Ahmad Abu-AkelInstitut de Psychologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Carrie AllisonAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, United Kingdom.
Krzysztof Z GajosHarvard Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States of America.
Katharina ReineckeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2355, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-9325
P Jason RentfrowDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-2118
Marcin A RadeckiAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8702-2381
Simon Baron-CohenAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-2544
Autism Research Institute · USHarvard University · USIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITInstitut für Psychologische Psychotherapie · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Department of Health BRC-1215-20014Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214322\Z\18\Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test (Eyes Test) is a widely used assessment of "theory of mind." The NIMH Research Domain Criteria recommends it as one of two tests for "understanding mental states." Previous studies have demonstrated an on-average female advantage on the Eyes Test. However, it is unknown whether this female advantage exists across the lifespan and across a large number of countries. Thus, we tested sex and age differences using the English version of the Eyes Test in adolescents and adults across 57 countries. We also tested for associations with sociodemographic and cognitive/personality factors. We leveraged one discovery dataset (

Indexed as

EyeSex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleage differencescognitive empathycross-culturalreading the mind in the eyessex differences

Identifiers

PMID36584298
PMCPMC9910622
OpenAlexW4313315358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.