Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36584215›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Gestational diabetes in women with obesity; an analysis of clinical history and simple clinical/anthropometric measures.

Sara L White, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Shahina Begum, Naveed Sattar, Scott M Nelson, Paul Seed, Lucilla Poston, UPBEAT consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early Postpartum IL-10 and IL-37 Concentrations in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara L WhiteDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-0508
Dharmintra PasupathyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shahina BegumDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Scott M NelsonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Level 2 New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7904-7933
Lucilla PostonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
UPBEAT consortium
King's College London · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/13/38/30289Chief Scientist Office CZB/A/680Department of Health NI-SI-0512-10104Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10452Department of Health SC039280Diabetes UK 14/0004849Medical Research Council MR/ L002477/1Medical Research Council MR/L002477/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe assessed clinical risk factors, anthropometric measures of adiposity and weight gain to determine associations with development of GDM in a cohort of pregnant women with obesity.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of the UPBEAT trial of a complex lifestyle intervention in pregnant women with obesity (ISRCTN89971375). Clinical risk factors, and measures of adiposity and weight were assessed in the early 2nd trimester (mean 17 +0 weeks), and adiposity and weight repeated in the early 3rd trimester (mean 27 +5 weeks').

resultsOf the 1117 women (median BMI 35.0 kg/m2) with complete data, 25.8% (n = 304) developed GDM (IADPSG criteria, OGTT 24-28weeks). Using multivariable analysis, early clinical risk factors associated with later development of GDM included age (adj OR 1.06 per year; 95% CI 1.04-1.09), previous GDM (3.27; 1.34-7.93) and systolic blood pressure (per 10mmHg, 1.34; 1.18-1.53). Anthropometric measures positively associated with GDM included second trimester (mean 17+0 weeks) subscapular skinfold thickness, (per 5mm, 1.12; 1.05-1.21), and neck circumference (per cm, 1.11; 1.05-1.18). GDM was not associated with gestational weight gain, or changes in skinfolds thicknesses or circumferences between visits.

conclusionsIn this cohort of women with obesity, we confirmed clinical risk factors for GDM, (age, systolic blood pressure) previously identified in heterogeneous weight women but add to these indices of adiposity which may provide a discriminatory approach to GDM risk assessment in this group. This study also underscores the need to focus on modifiable factors pre-pregnancy as an opportunity for GDM prevention, as targeting gestational weight gain and adiposity during pregnancy is likely to be less effective.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGestational Weight GainBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansObesityPregnancyPregnant PeopleWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID36584215
PMCPMC9803279
OpenAlexW4313315650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.