ArticlePloS one2022
Comparison of chloroplast genomes and phylogenomics in the Ficus sarmentosa complex (Moraceae).
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2026Article
- Plastome evolution in annual Brachypodium species reveals widespread heteroplasmy and chloroplast capture, lineage-specific codon usage bias, and low positive selection.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of plastome structure in Sphagnum species from China.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of EightCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Chloroplast genome analysis and phylogenetic position of Polygonatum sinopubescens and comparison with related species.PloS one · 2025Article
- Complete plastome genomes of three medicinal heliotropiaceae species: comparative analyses and phylogenetic relationships.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Hybridization, polyploidization, and morphological convergence make dozens of taxa into one chaotic genetic pool: a phylogenomic case of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Characterization and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Plastomes of FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to maternal inheritance and minimal rearrangement, the chloroplast genome is an important genetic resource for evolutionary studies. However, the evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic performance of chloroplast genomes in closely related species are poorly characterized, particularly in taxonomically complex and species-rich groups. The taxonomically unresolved Ficus sarmentosa species complex (Moraceae) comprises approximately 20 taxa with unclear genetic background. In this study, we explored the evolutionary dynamics, hotspot loci, and phylogenetic performance of thirteen chloroplast genomes (including eleven newly obtained and two downloaded from NCBI) representing the F. sarmentosa complex. Their sequence lengths, IR boundaries, repeat sequences, and codon usage were compared. Both sequence length and IR boundaries were found to be highly conserved. All four categories of long repeat sequences were found across all 13 chloroplast genomes, with palindromic and forward sequences being the most common. The number of simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci varied from 175 (F. dinganensis and F. howii) to 190 (F. polynervis), with the dinucleotide motif appearing the most frequently. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis indicated that codons ending with A/T were prior to those ending with C/T. The majority of coding sequence regions were found to have undergone negative selection with the exception of ten genes (accD, clpP, ndhK, rbcL, rpl20, rpl22, rpl23, rpoC1, rps15, and rps4) which exhibited potential positive selective signatures. Five hypervariable genic regions (rps15, ycf1, rpoA, ndhF, and rpl22) and five hypervariable intergenic regions (trnH-GUG-psbA, rpl32-trnL-UAG, psbZ-trnG-GCC, trnK-UUU-rps16 and ndhF-rpl32) were identified. Overall, phylogenomic analysis based on 123 Ficus chloroplast genomes showed promise for studying the evolutionary relationships in Ficus, despite cyto-nuclear discordance. Furthermore, based on the phylogenetic performance of the F. sarmentosa complex and F. auriculata complex, the chloroplast genome also exhibited a promising phylogenetic resolution in closely related species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.