Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36584163›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A digital pathology workflow for the segmentation and classification of gastric glands: Study of gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia cases.

Panagiotis Barmpoutis, William Waddingham, Jing Yuan, Christopher Ross, Hamzeh Kayhanian, Tania Stathaki, Daniel C Alexander, Marnix Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnosing and grading gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia using semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images: development and validation study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiotis BarmpoutisDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-7943
William WaddinghamDepartment of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jing YuanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher RossDepartment of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hamzeh KayhanianDepartment of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tania StathakiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel C AlexanderDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marnix JansenDepartment of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S022244/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Gastric atrophy (GA) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the mucosa of the stomach have been found to increase the risk of gastric cancer and are considered precancerous lesions. Therefore, the early detection of GA and IM may have a valuable role in histopathological risk assessment. However, GA and IM are difficult to confirm endoscopically and, following the Sydney protocol, their diagnosis depends on the analysis of glandular morphology and on the identification of at least one well-defined goblet cell in a set of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) -stained biopsy samples. To this end, the precise segmentation and classification of glands from the histological images plays an important role in the diagnostic confirmation of GA and IM. In this paper, we propose a digital pathology end-to-end workflow for gastric gland segmentation and classification for the analysis of gastric tissues. The proposed GAGL-VTNet, initially, extracts both global and local features combining multi-scale feature maps for the segmentation of glands and, subsequently, it adopts a vision transformer that exploits the visual dependences of the segmented glands towards their classification. For the analysis of gastric tissues, segmentation of mucosa is performed through an unsupervised model combining energy minimization and a U-Net model. Then, features of the segmented glands and mucosa are extracted and analyzed. To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed methodology we created the GAGL dataset consisting of 85 WSI, collected from 20 patients. The results demonstrate the existence of significant differences of the extracted features between normal, GA and IM cases. The proposed approach for gland and mucosa segmentation achieves an object dice score equal to 0.908 and 0.967 respectively, while for the classification of glands it achieves an F1 score equal to 0.94 showing great potential for the automated quantification and analysis of gastric biopsies.

Indexed as

Gastritis, AtrophicHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriPrecancerous ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsAtrophyGastric MucosaHumansMetaplasiaWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID36584163
PMCPMC9803139
OpenAlexW4313315915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.