Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36584151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Mechanical strain induces ex vivo expansion of periosteum.

Mary M Walker, Molly E Baumann, John H Alexander, Britani N Blackstone, Christopher B Morgan, Thomas J Scharschmidt, Heather M Powell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary M WalkerUniversity Laboratory Animal Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-6690
Molly E BaumannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
John H AlexanderDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-5393
Britani N BlackstoneDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Christopher B MorganDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Thomas J ScharschmidtDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Heather M PowellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6845-8101
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USDayton Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental bone defects present complex clinical challenges. Nonunion, malunion, and infection are common sequalae of autogenous bone grafts, allografts, and synthetic bone implants due to poor incorporation with the patient's bone. The current project explores the osteogenic properties of periosteum to facilitate graft incorporation. As tissue area is a natural limitation of autografting, mechanical strain was implemented to expand the periosteum. Freshly harvested, porcine periosteum was strained at 5 and 10% per day for 10 days with non-strained and free-floating samples serving as controls. Total tissue size, viability and histologic examination revealed that strain increased area to a maximum of 1.6-fold in the 10% daily strain. No change in tissue anatomy or viability via MTT or Ki67 staining and quantification was observed among groups. The osteogenic potential of the mechanical expanded periosteum was then examined in vivo. Human cancellous allografts were wrapped with 10% per day strained, fresh, free-floating, or no porcine periosteum and implanted subcutaneously into female, athymic mice. Tissue was collected at 8- and 16-weeks. Gene expression analysis revealed a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin in the fresh periosteum group at 8-weeks post implantation compared to all other groups. Values among all groups were similar at week 16. Additionally, histological assessment with H&E and Masson-Goldner Trichrome staining showed that all periosteal groups outperformed the non-periosteal allograft, with fresh periosteum demonstrating the highest levels of new tissue mineralization at the periosteum-bone interface. Overall, mechanical expansion of the periosteum can provide increased area for segmental healing via autograft strategies, though further studies are needed to explore culture methodology to optimize osteogenic potential.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisPeriosteumAnimalsBone TransplantationFemaleHumansMiceSwineTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID36584151
PMCPMC9803115
OpenAlexW4313306263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.