Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36584096›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Sparse canonical correlation to identify breast cancer related genes regulated by copy number aberrations.

Diptavo Dutta, Ananda Sen, Jaya Satagopan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diptavo DuttaDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-9040
Ananda SenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Jaya SatagopanDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Study of exposures and biomarkers in cancer epidemiologyR01CA197402 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number aberrations (CNAs) in cancer affect disease outcomes by regulating molecular phenotypes, such as gene expressions, that drive important biological processes. To gain comprehensive insights into molecular biomarkers for cancer, it is critical to identify key groups of CNAs, the associated gene modules, regulatory modules, and their downstream effect on outcomes.

methodsIn this paper, we demonstrate an innovative use of sparse canonical correlation analysis (sCCA) to effectively identify the ensemble of CNAs, and gene modules in the context of binary and censored disease endpoints. Our approach detects potentially orthogonal gene expression modules which are highly correlated with sets of CNA and then identifies the genes within these modules that are associated with the outcome.

resultsAnalyzing clinical and genomic data on 1,904 breast cancer patients from the METABRIC study, we found 14 gene modules to be regulated by groups of proximally located CNA sites. We validated this finding using an independent set of 1,077 breast invasive carcinoma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our analysis of 7 clinical endpoints identified several novel and interpretable regulatory associations, highlighting the role of CNAs in key biological pathways and processes for breast cancer. Genes significantly associated with the outcomes were enriched for early estrogen response pathway, DNA repair pathways as well as targets of transcription factors such as E2F4, MYC, and ETS1 that have recognized roles in tumor characteristics and survival. Subsequent meta-analysis across the endpoints further identified several genes through the aggregation of weaker associations.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that sCCA analysis can aggregate weaker associations to identify interpretable and important genes, modules, and clinically consequential pathways.

Indexed as

Canonical Correlation AnalysisNeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36584096
PMCPMC9803132
OpenAlexW4313306335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.