ArticleJournal of athletic training2023
Financial Impact of Embedded Injury-Prevention Experts in US Army Initial Entry Training.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Return on Investment of U.S. Army Holistic Health and Fitness Performance Teams: A Matched Difference-in-Differences Study of Readiness and Economic Outcomes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Exploring Law Enforcement Officers' Experiences with Athletic Trainers and Work-Related Injury.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe US Army embedded injury-prevention experts (IPEs), specifically athletic trainers and strength and conditioning coaches, into initial entry training (IET) to limit musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and their negative consequences. However, little is known about the financial impact of IPEs.
objectiveTo assess whether IPEs were associated with fewer sunk training costs due to MSK-related early discharges from service.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingDatabase of US Army soldiers' administrative, medical, and readiness records. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsA total of 198 166 soldiers (age = 20.7 ± 3.2 years, body mass index = 24.4 ± 3.5 kg/m2) who began IET during 2014 to 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Early discharge from service was defined as occurring within 6 months of beginning IET. All IET sites employed IPEs from 2011 to 2017, except for 2 sites during April to November 2015. Soldiers who began IET at these 2 sites during these times were categorized as not having IPE exposure. All others were categorized as having IPE exposure. The unadjusted association between IPE access and MSK-related early discharge from service was assessed using logistic regression. Financial impact was assessed by quantifying differences in yearly sunk costs between groups with and those without IPE exposure and subtracting IPE hiring costs.
resultsAmong 14 094 soldiers without IPE exposure, 2.77% were discharged early for MSK-related reasons. Among 184 072 soldiers with IPE exposure, 1.01% were discharged. Exposure to IPEs was associated with reduced odds of MSK-related early discharge (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.40, P < .001) and a decrease in yearly sunk training costs of $11.19 to $20.00 million.
conclusionsEmploying IPEs was associated with reduced sunk costs because of fewer soldiers being discharged from service early for MSK-related reasons. Evidence-based recommendations should be developed for guiding policy on the roles and responsibilities of IPEs in the military to reduce negative outcomes from MSK conditions and generate a positive return on investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.