Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36583911›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Deep Learning Model for the Detection of Corneal Edema Before Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty on Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Karen Bitton, Pierre Zéboulon, Wassim Ghazal, Maria Rizk, Sina Elahi, Damien Gatinel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Detection of graft failure in post-keratoplasty patients by automated deep learning.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen BittonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre ZéboulonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Wassim GhazalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Maria RizkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Sina ElahiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Damien GatinelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the preferred method for treating corneal endothelial dysfunction, such as Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). The surgical indication is based on the patients' symptoms and the presence of corneal edema. We developed an automated tool based on deep learning to detect edema in corneal optical coherence tomography images. This study aimed to evaluate this approach in edema detection before Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery, for patients with or without FECD. Methods: We used our previously described model allowing to classify each pixel in the corneal optical coherence tomography images as "normal" or "edema." We included 1992 images of normal and preoperative edematous corneas. We calculated the edema fraction (EF), defined as the ratio between the number of pixels labeled as "edema," and those representing the cornea for each patient. Differential central corneal thickness (DCCT), defined as the difference in central corneal thickness before and 6 months after surgery, was used to quantify preoperative edema. AUC of EF for the edema detection was calculated for Several DCCT thresholds and a value of 20 µm was selected to define significant edema as it provided the highest area under the curve value. Results: The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for EF for the detection of 20 µm of DCCT was 0.97 for all patients, 0.96 for Fuchs and normal only and 0.99 for non-FECD and normal patients. The optimal EF threshold was 0.143 for all patients and patients with FECD. Conclusions: Our model is capable of objectively detecting minimal corneal edema before Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery. Translational Relevance: Deep learning can help to interpret optical coherence tomography scans and aid the surgeon in decision-making.

Indexed as

Corneal EdemaDeep LearningDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyDescemet MembraneEdemaHumansTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID36583911
PMCPMC9807180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.